Microsoft Activation Script 1.0 UPD 📢

DOWNLOAD ->->->->

Microsoft Activation Script 1.0

IScripts, Inc. 575.0 Kb. 1.02 MB. All Software / File made available by IScripts, Inc. IScripts. Inc. May not distribute without my express written consent. In attempting to.
Compatible with Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1. It can be used for activation of Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows.Q:

Custom Transaction Log vs Primary Transaction Log

I have a store with the following structure:

Company A:

Company A A Store
Company A B Store
Company A C Store
Company A D Store

Company B:

Company B A Store
Company B B Store
Company B C Store

…and so on. This is a pretty simple structure that I inherited, but I’m trying to figure out the best way to handle the SQL Server transaction logs. Right now, this is what I’ve come up with:

Company A:

Primary: Transactions.Trl_User_ID = 2
Log = Company A A Store

Company B:

Primary: Transactions.Trl_User_ID = 2
Log = Company B A Store

…and so on

I’ll admit that this was a really quick and easy way to create the logs, but I’m concerned about the database performance if I have lots of companies.
My questions are:

Is there a better way to do this?
If not, will this result in a slower system if I have lots of companies? (The data that is being inserted is pretty small, but I can’t guarantee it will stay this way.)

A:

I’d suggest renaming the internal tables to something without the company name. This way, you won’t have to change anything when you add or remove stores. If you still need to do that, I’d suggest creating a trigger that replaces the company name with a constant value. That way, you only need to do that once.
However, you are correct that this method does not scale very well. I’d suggest you setup a database snapshot and use that for subsequent runs.